home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
062292
/
0622992.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
2KB
|
56 lines
<text id=92TT1396>
<title>
June 22, 1992: No Excuses
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
June 22, 1992 Allergies
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK, Page 25
NATION
No Excuses
</hdr><body>
<p>In a close vote, the House defeats the balanced-budget amendment
</p>
<p> Score one for the beleaguered house of representatives, which
demonstrated last week that there are limits to political
cynicism, even in a presidential election year. In a surprising
turnabout, the House narrowly rejected the balanced-budget
amendment to the Constitution by a vote of 280 to 153, just nine
votes shy of the required two-thirds majority. The vote was a
rebuff to President Bush, who has staked his dwindling prestige
on amending the Constitution to mandate by fiat a balanced
budget -- the holy grail of government that has eluded
Presidents and legislators for the past 23 years.
</p>
<p> After a day of complicated roll-call votes designed to
offer political cover to legislators from both parties, the
House Democratic leadership muscled its members into providing
150 of the 153 votes opposed to tinkering with the
Constitution. The showdown ballot was on an amendment by
conservative Texas Democratic Congressman Charles Stenholm that
would have required a three-fifths vote of Congress for the
government to engage in deficit spending; implementation would
have been shrewdly delayed until 1997, when Bush and many
current legislators would not have to deal with the resulting
budgetary and legal chaos. Small wonder that Democratic
Congressman Mike Synar ridiculed the proposal as "the
constitutional equivalent of hanging garlic in the window to
ward off vampires."
</p>
<p> The maneuvering was an introduction to the three-way
politics likely to dominate the presidential race. Bush seized
on the nostrum to divert attention from the $1 trillion in red
ink added to the deficit during his presidency. Presumptive
Democratic nominee Bill Clinton opposed it. But the pivotal
factor may have been independent Ross Perot, who attacked the
balanced-budget amendment as "an excuse not to do anything."
</p>
</body></article>
</text>